Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1907No. L.A. No. 1695PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

These are appeals by defendant from a judgment given against it for $5,642.95, and from an order denying its motion to vacate and set aside such judgment. The judgment was given upon the failure of defendant to answer after its demurrer to the complaint had been overruled, its default for not answering having been duly entered. After the taking of the appeals William T. McArthur was substituted as plaintiff.

It is admitted that no error or irregularity is shown by the judgment-roll. The only contention made on these appeals is that the lower court erred in denying the motion to vacate and set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Moore v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Winchester v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re DahnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Emerson v. HughesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  5. In re B. & R. Glove Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API