Legal Opinion

State v. King

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1974No. 69PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Before entering a plea in Superior Court, defendant moved “to quash the warrants for that the same are unconstitutional.” This motion was denied. On appeal the Court of Appeals reversed saying: “We certainly do not say that G.S. 14-190.9 is unconstitutional. We merely say that it is not applicable to the conduct here. . . . We do hold that the court committed reversible error in failing to grant defendant’s motion to quash the warrants in this case.”

We agree with the Court of Appeals that the warrants should be quashed but for an entirely different reason — not because G.S.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Wisneski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. State v. StreathCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API