Legal Opinion

Tully v. Department of Justice

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 21, 2007No. 2007-3004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Mathew B. Tully petitions for review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, which held that his employer does not owe him payment for 27 holidays which occurred while he was on leave without pay to serve on active duty in the U.S. Army. We affirm the decision of the Board.

I

Mr. Tully served on active duty in the U.S. Army from October 9, 1995, to April 9, 1998. While serving, Mr. Tully was absent from his position with his employer, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), an agency within the U.S. Department of Justice. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kenneth H. Waltermyer v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Casey Clarkson v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Sandoval v. City of Chicago, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Lisdahl v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & ResearchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  4. Duffer v. United Continental Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. Thaddaeus Myrick v. City of Hoover, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API