Sandoval v. City of Chicago, Illinois
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.
Two of Chicago’s police officers filed this suit under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-35. They want to be sergeants. This position requires a competitive examination, which all candidates take simultaneously to curtail the risks of cheating. Chicago scheduled an exam for March 25, 2006. Juan Sandoval and Sidney Pennix then were on military duty— Sandoval in El Salvador and Pennix in Iraq. Both asked for an opportunity to take the test outside the United States. Ernst & Young administers Chicago’s civil-service exams…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lori L. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, James R. Klauser, Lee MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Crews v. City of Mt. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Eric Gross v. PPG Industries, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Lisdahl v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & ResearchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Jonathan Dorris v. TXD ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Bjelobrk v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.