Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 25, 1993No. CR 93-402PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This case involves a consideration of the Arkansas implied consent law, codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-65-202, 5-65-205 (Supp. 1991), and the effectiveness of a. waiver of trial by jury. We hold that the appellant effectively waived his right to trial by jury and that his assessments of our implied consent law and a police implied-consent admonition form are of no moment.

The appellant, Mickie Gean Johnson, was arrested by State Trooper Mark Meadows on July 26, 1991, for driving while intoxicated, fleeing, and violation of the implied consent law. He was tried in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Calnan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Winkle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Venable v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. McDonald's Corp. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Garrison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API