Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 5, 1959No. 4747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the Honorable Senate:

The undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court submit the following answers to the inquiries contained in your resolution *82dated April 15, 1959, relating to Senate Bill No. 66, as amended entitled “An Act relative to fees for licenses for pharmacies and pharmacists.” Senate Bill No. 66 amends RSA ch. 318 by making nominal increases in certain fees for licenses and permits for both pharmacies and pharmacists. Since this bill would increase the amount of money that the State receives in fees, you have requested our opinion as to whether such a bill may originate in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Twin City Bank v. NebekerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Millard v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1781
  4. United States v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Mikell v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Barber v. RitterColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API