Legal Opinion
Barber v. Ritter
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 2007No. 05CA0752PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
In this case involving the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR), Colo. Const. art. X, § 20, and Colo. Const. art. XI, §§ 3-4, plaintiffs, Douglas H. Barber, Rick Kerber, and Heggem-Lundquist Paint Company (collectively, the Taxpayers), appeal the trial court's order dismissing their general claims and Heggem-Lundquist's individual claims, and the summary judgment in favor of defendants, former Governor Bill Owens and former State Treasurer Mike Coffman (the state defendants). After the notice of appeal was filed, a notice of substitution was filed pursuant to C.A.R.…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Doremus v. Board of Ed. of HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Comcast of California/Colorado, L.L.C. v. Express Concrete, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- HCA-HEALTHONE, LLC v. City of Lone TreeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Barber v. RitterColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.