Legal Opinion

State v. Colestock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From "Washington: Thos. A. McBride, Judge. Ezra Colestock, feeling he has not received justice by a sentence of twelve years in the penitentiary, appeals from a conviction of rape.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The defendant, Ezra E. Colestock, was convicted of the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed by forcibly ravishing a female named Mary E. Thompson; and, having been sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of twelve years, he appeals, assigning as error the action of the trial court in refusing to charge the jury as requested, and in *10giving an instruction of which he complains. To render the alleged error intelligible, it is deemed necessary to detail the facts disclosed by the transcript. The bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the evidence given at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People of the State of N.Y. v. . DohringNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. State v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  3. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. MorrisonCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York · 1854

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State of Oregon v. RisenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. FriddlesOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. ForsythCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State v. ChristensenOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API