State v. Tucker
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union : Robert Eakin, Judge; Harry Tucker, not being satisfied with a conviction for burglary, appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
1. The defendant Harry Tucker was accused, by an information filed by the district attorney, of the crime of “burglary, not in a dwelling house,” jointly with one Wilbur Fruit, and, upon conviction thereof, judgment was entered against him, from which he appeals. He complains that he was unlawfully accused, and therefore not duly convicted. This is based upon the contention that the act of the legislative assembly of February 17, 1899 (Laws, 1899, p. 99), is in violation of the Oregon Constitution, Article VII, § 18, which involves, also, the inquiry whether he has not been deprived of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hallinger v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Rowan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Charge to Grand JuryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1872
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sawyer v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Brooks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. GortmakerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Ju NunOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.