Legal Opinion
People of the State of N.Y. v. . Dohring
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1874PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It has been held that the two justices of the Sessions are indispensable to constitute a legally organized Court of Sessions, and that neither can be dispensed with, any more than the county judge. (Blend v. The People, 41 N.Y., 604.) The question there arose, however, upon objection and exception taken by the plaintiff in error, and was passed upon as an error, and not as a matter affecting the jurisdiction of the court. The court was held disorganized, by one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- The People v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- People v. AbbotNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Crosswell v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- State ex rel. M.T.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.