Legal Opinion

Sanfilippo v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2008No. 06-56479PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Antonio Sanfilippo appeals the district court’s order affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security that Sanfilippo is not entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. The parties are familiar with the facts, which we repeat here only to the extent necessary. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the Commissioner’s denial of benefits de novo, see Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart, 371 F.3d 593, 595 (9th Cir.2004), and reverse.

This court will affirm the Commissioner’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Batson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Silva Tonapetyan v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Sherry Howard, on Behalf of Sarah Wolff v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stimson v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Stenson v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. Webb v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API