Legal Opinion

Stenson v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 29, 2021No. 3:19-cv-07543-JSCUnknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 G.S., Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-cv-07543-JSC 8 v. 9 ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR 10 ANDREW SAUL, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 15 & 18 11 12 Plaintiff seeks social security benefits for physical and mental impairments including 13 cervical radiculopathy with chronic neck and shoulder pain, lumbar facet arthropathy with chronic 14 lumbar pain and radiculopathy, depression, anxiety, and complications arising from an 15 electrocution. (See Administrative Record (“AR”) 18.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API