Stimson v. Colvin
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos., 17, 21
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Hubert Stimson seeks review of the final decision of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), denying his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Stimson’s Motion for Summary Judgment, DENIES the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDS Stimson’s claim to the Commissioner…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boteo v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Collins v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Jones v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Sauder v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020