Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Davis-Standard Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 12, 2007No. CIV.A. 03-10329-EFHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.

After oral arguments and consideration of submissions by the parties, the Court rules on the summary judgment motion of Third-Party Plaintiff Davis-Standard Corporation (“Davis-Standard”) as to the counterclaims of Third-Party Defendant and Counterclaimant Sentinel Products Corporation (“Sentinel”) as follows:

Davis-Standard and Sentinel are the two remaining parties in what was originally a cause of action by Plaintiff Robert G. Hooper, Jr., against Davis-Standard, resulting from personal injuries caused in 2002 by an allegedly defective…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marcil v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  3. Cruickshank v. Clean Seas Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  4. Karl's Shoe Stores, Ltd. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1956
  5. Canal Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strategic Energy, LLC v. Western Massachusetts Electric Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  2. Rezendes v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
  3. Rezendes v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API