Legal Opinion
Karl's Shoe Stores, Ltd. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 23, 1956No. Civ. A. 56-198PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The substance of the claim of the plaintiff in this action, a California corporation engaged in the retail shoe business, is set forth in paragraph 4 of its complaint, which alleges:
“4. -That on or about March 8, 1954, the plaintiff corporation was caused to suffer financial loss as a result of the carelessness and negligence of the defendant, its agents, servants or employees, in that the defendant did sell for use by manufacturers, a cement compound to be used in cementing the soles of shoes to the uppers of shoes; that said cementing as it was sold by the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Genesee County Patrons Fire Relief Ass'n v. L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- A. J. P. Contracting Corp. v. Brooklyn Builders Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- McDonough v. WhalenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Marcil v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Agristor Leasing v. SpindlerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1987
- Fordyce Concrete, Inc. v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.