Legal Opinion

Canal Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 31, 1992No. Nos. 91-1432, 91-1433 and 91-1504PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREYER, Chief Judge.

The consolidated appeals in this diversity case arise out of the discovery, between 1983 and 1985, of tiny cracks (called “fretting”) in the turbine blades of a Canal Electric Company generator. Canal Electric Company sued the firm that had promised to service the generator, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, claiming that Westinghouse had breached both the generator’s service and equipment warranties. Several Canal customers (the third-party plaintiffs) also sued Westinghouse, claiming that the cracks harmed them, by disrupting Canal’s operations, and thereby bringing…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. MahdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arthur D. Little International, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  2. Dinwiddie v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Flagship West, LLC v. Excel Realty Partners, L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Hopper v. Davis-Standard Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  5. Canal Electric Company v. Westinghouse Electric Company, Commonwealth Electric Company, Canal Electric Company v. Westinghouse Electric Company, Canal Electric Company v. Westinghouse Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API