Legal Opinion
Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Crook County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 20, 1993No. 93-050; CA A80807PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*10WARREN, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming Crook County’s approval of a preliminary development plan for a planned unit development (PUD). Petitioner attempted to raise issues in the county proceedings concerning the compliance of the proposal with county comprehensive plan and zoning provisions. However, the county governing body concluded that, under its interpretation of applicable local legislation, those issues had been finally resolved in the earlier review stage that resulted in approval of the outline development plan for the PUD, and the issues could not be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Langford v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Carlsen v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- George's Inc. v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995