Legal Opinion
State v. Mantz
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided October 13, 2009No. 35540PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRATTON, Judge.
Tim Carl Mantz appeals from the judgment and conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of aggravated assault, Idaho Code §§ 18-901, 905, and 906, which sentence was enhanced for use of a firearm pursuant to I.C. § 19-2520. Mantz contends that his right to confrontation under both the United States and Idaho Constitutions was violated when the district court admitted preliminary hearing testimony of an unavailable witness.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Mantz was charged by criminal complaint with aggravated assault. The complaint al leged that Mantz…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. Kyle Alan RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Coronado, TommyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Coronado, TommyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011