Coronado v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON and ALCALA, JJ., joined.
We granted review of this case to determine whether the videotape procedures set out in Article 38.071, § 2,1 including the use of written interrogatories in lieu of live testimony and cross-examination, satisfy the Sixth Amendment rights of confrontation and cross-examination under the Su*317preme Court’s Crawford2 line of cases.3 In this aggravated-sexual-assault-of-a-child prosecution, the court of appeals found “no error in the trial court’s decision to allow cross-examination through written questions only” and to admit the child…
3Cases cited33 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by60 opinions
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Miller, Arthur Franklin Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- People v. PhillipsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Felix Amador v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.