Legal Opinion
State v. Kyle Alan Richardson
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2014No. 40507PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Coeur d’Alene, April 2014 Term.
1Opinion of the Court
W. JONES, Justice.
I. Nature of the Case
The State charged Kyle A. Richardson with three counts of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of I.C. § 37-2732(a)(1)(A). After a preliminary hearing in which a confidential informant testified for the State, the State filed a motion requesting that the district court allow the State to admit into evidence at trial a transcript of the confidential informant’s preliminary hearing testimony. The State sought admission of the confidential informant’s testimony because the confidential informant had died and thus was unavailable as a witness for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. Jorge A. Lopez-OrozcoIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Darol Keith AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Cesar A. SepulvedaIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Angela Marie BoehmIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. ParteeIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.