Julian Robert Marfil v. State

HILL, Justice.

[T1] A jury convieted Julian Marfil of two counts of second degree sexual abuse of a minor. On appeal, Mr. Marfil contends that the district court abused its discretion when it refused his proffered instruction defining the term "inflicts," as that term is used in the charged statute's phrase "inflicts sexual intrusion on a victim." Mr. Marfil further contends that the district court erred when it denied the jury's request for a dictionary during its deliberations. We affirm.

ISSUE

[T2] Mr. Marfil frames the issue on appeal as follows:

I. Did the trial court err by refusing…