Legal Opinion
Mathewson v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 2019No. S-18-0026PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOMGAARDEN, Justice.
[¶1] Paul D. Mathewson appeals his drug-related criminal convictions contending the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence and his motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial. Mr. Mathewson also challenges his conviction for felony possession of a controlled substance, claiming the liquid contained in his water pipe (bong water), which tested positive for methamphetamine, does not constitute "a controlled substance in a liquid form" as contemplated *197by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031 (LexisNexis 2017). Finding no error, we affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Mr.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lo Sasso v. BraunWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bradley Ross Fairbourn v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Black Diamond Energy of Delaware Inc., a Foreign Corporation v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Phillip D. Cotney v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Eduardo Vlahos v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- James Leonard Mills v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.