Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Wood
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 1996No. C8-95-2101Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal challenges the requirement to register as a predatory offender under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 for a conviction “arising out of the same set of circumstances” as a charged sex offense. Because a contested issue exists on whether the conviction arose from the same factual circumstances as the charged predatory offense, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
In April 1991 the state charged Thomas Murphy with first degree criminal sexual conduct involving an adult female, first degree burglary, aggravated robbery, second degree…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Gaspord v. Washington County Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977