Legal Opinion

Friia v. Friia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 2001PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Vincent Filia, Jr., (Vincent) appeals the trial court’s order denying his Motion to Enforce Settlement. Vincent contends that the court erred in its interpretation of the parties’ settlement agreement requiring payment of certain costs out of proceeds from the sale of real property prior to distribution of the proceeds remaining. We conclude that the trial court did not err in its interpretation of the governing provision of the agreement, and we affirm the court’s order denying Vincent’s petb tion to enforce settlement.

¶ 2 This appeal arises out of lengthy and bitter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Charles D. Stein Revocable Trust v. General Felt Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Kramer v. SchaefferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. National Recovery Systems v. PerlmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Estate of Haiko v. McGinleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Miller v. GinsbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Thompson v. T.J. Whipple Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API