Legal Opinion

National Recovery Systems v. Perlman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1987No. 02864PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal presents the issue of whether an order denying a motion to enforce an alleged settlement agreement is appealable. We find that it is not, and therefore quash this appeal.

On September 19, 1985, appellant National Recovery Systems filed an action in assumpsit to recover $18,000 which appellee Allen Perlman had allegedly borrowed and failed to repay. Appellee filed preliminary objections which were argued and subsequently denied. On December 26, 1985, *548appellee filed an answer and new matter to appellant’s action. The case was then scheduled to be heard by an arbitration…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Mineo v. TanciniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Continental Bank v. Andrew Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Friia v. FriiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Lanci v. Metropolitan InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Kramer v. SchaefferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API