Legal Opinion

Estate of Haiko v. McGinley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 2002PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Neil McGinley and Theresa McGin-ley (“the McGinleys”) appeal the trial court’s order granting a petition to enforce settlement filed by the Estate of Stephen J. Haiko (“the Estate”). The McGinleys contend that the court erred in ordering enforcement because the parties had never entered a cognizable settlement of the underlying claim. The McGinleys argue in the alternative that if a settlement is deemed to exist, any right the Estate had to enforce its provisions was waived when the Estate failed to file an appropriate objection during the McGinleys’ subsequent Chapter 7…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Estate of LakatoshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Western United Life Assurance Company v. Debra Ann HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Cheathem v. Temple University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. BirdseyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Coulter v. RamsdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Eichman v. McKeonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Giant Food Stores, LLC v. THF Silver Spring Development, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Greenville Gastroenterology, SCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Villoresi v. FemminellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API