Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1948No. 3550, 3551PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Bartlett, Edwards, Walker-Smith Company, 1 and Kee were charged by indictment with a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 88. Five other individuals were also charged as co-defendants but the indictment was dismissed as to them and the Company.

The indictment charged that the defendants conspired to violate laws of the United States respecting the rationing of sugar and the control of sugar prices; that the conspiracy was to be carried out in substantially the following manner: That Bartlett, with the consent of the Company and Kee, its manager at Hobbs, New Mexico, would issue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Curtis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Bartlett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Milton Robbins A/K/A Mickey Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  2. Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. David Martin Goldsmith v. Lawrence Cheney, Sheriff of Teton County, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Darrell Wayne ConditCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Harold Eugene Kistner, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API