Legal Opinion
United States v. Reink Kamer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1986No. 85-5013PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Reink Kamer was charged with 57 counts of conspiracy, mail fraud, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 371, 1341, and 1343, respectively. Pursuant to a binding plea agreement with the government, Kamer withdrew his plea of not guilty and pled guilty to three counts. Kamer appeals to this court contending that the judgment must be vacated because (1) his guilty plea violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in that the trial court failed to (a) ascertain whether the plea was voluntary, (b) establish the factual basis for the plea,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- United States v. Michael Leslie BlaylockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Marvin GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Frido SeesingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.