Legal Opinion
Pulliam v. Pulliam
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 23, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4871PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.
The only issue involved in this appeal is the custody provision in the dissolution decree. The trial court found that it was in the best interests of the two children, ages one and five, that the appellee father be given their custody. Substantial evidence supports this decision and we will not disturb it on appeal. Not only do we find no abuse of discretion, the totality of the evidence supports the award. See Ward v. Ward, 91 Ariz. 296, 371 P.2d 1022 (1962).
The appellant makes three specific contentions which we must address:
1) A stipulation whereby the parties…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bearman v. CamatsosTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Al Burstein and Violet R. Burstein, Co-Partners Doing Business as Braeburn Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Pierson v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Foote v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pulliam v. PulliamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984