Legal Opinion

Foote v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1962No. Appeals, 95 and 177PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Keim,

This case is before the Court on two appeals, the first at No. 95 March Term, 1962, wherein the defendant complains of the trial court having modified the verdict by increasing it from $33,732.50 to $39,564.40, and allowing no credit for moneys already paid by the defendant, which is contrary to a stipulation entered into by the parties before the trial of this case. The second appeal is at No. 177 March Term, 1962, where in the plaintiff complains of the rejection of her motion for a new trial. It is to be noted that both appeals are from the Court of Common Pleas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Foley Bros., Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Muir v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Manufacturers Natural Gas Co. v. Birmingham & Brownsville Macadamized Turnpike Road Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Zvonik v. ZvonikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Northbrook Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Parsonese v. Midland National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API