Legal Opinion
Al Burstein and Violet R. Burstein, Co-Partners Doing Business as Braeburn Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1956No. 15423PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
The question raised by this appeal is the adequacy of damages allowed appellants, plaintiffs below and hereinafter so referred to. Plaintiffs contracted to furnish the Army 144,000 Cooks trousers at $1.89 per pair. Plaintiffs' action is based upon their claim that the appellee, United States of America, defendant below, had breached its contract by requiring plaintiffs to produce and deliver a disproportionate quantity of larger sizes. Plaintiffs contended that a tariff of sizes, specifying the number of small, medium, large, and extra-large garments to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- H. Hackfeld & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Platt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- In Re MilburneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Gomez-Candelaria v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Chao v. Hotel Oasis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Alfred H. Osborne, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Farmers Co-Operative Elevator Association Non-Stock of Big Springs, Nebraska, a Cooperative Corporation v. Arthur C. StrandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.