Legal Opinion
Pulliam v. Pulliam
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 23, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4871PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 Ariz. 343 (1984)
678 P.2d 528
Emily PULLIAM, Petitioner/Appellant,
v.
Jack PULLIAM, Respondent/Appellee.
No. 2 CA-CIV 4871.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.
February 23, 1984.
Clinton L. Liechty, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant.
Lieberthal & Kashman, P.C. by Howard A. Kashman, Tucson, for respondent/appellee.
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.
The only issue involved in this appeal is the custody provision in the dissolution decree. The trial court found that it was in the best interests of the two children, ages one and five, that the appellee father be given their custody. Substantial evidence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bearman v. CamatsosTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Al Burstein and Violet R. Burstein, Co-Partners Doing Business as Braeburn Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Foote v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Vernon I. Marden v. The International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Rutledge v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Phoenix union/az School v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Widner v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021