Legal Opinion

Cardosanto v. Cardosanto

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 24, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This proceeding was properly brought under subdivision 8 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. Upon due notice of revocation of the license of the occupant, the landlord became entitled to possession of the premises.

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to landlord, and final order directed for' the landlord as prayed for in the petition, with appropriate costs in the court below. Issuance of warrant stayed to and .including November 30, 1958.

Concur — Pette, Habt and Bbown, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murawski v. MelkunCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  2. Brennecke v. Smith, New York County Courts1964
  3. Tausik v. TausikAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1960
  4. Tausik v. TausikCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959