Legal Opinion

Tausik v. Tausik

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 14, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The refusal of our courts to entertain summary proceedings against a refractory spouse, trespasser though she may be (see cases cited in dissenting opinion; 1951 Report of N. Y. Law Rev. Comm., p. 65), was one of the reasons which led the Legislature to add subdivision 8 to section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act, affording to the 11 spouse with the legal right to possession” the simple and speedy relief of summary proceedings where “ the husband and wife separate ” (1951 Report of N. Y. Law Rev, Comm., p. 65). The availability of the remedy provided by subdivision 8 is not limited to a case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cardosanto v. CardosantoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
  2. Cardosanto v. CardosantoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murawski v. MelkunCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  2. Brennecke v. Smith, New York County Courts1964
  3. Rosenstiel v. RosenstielNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Halaby v. Halaby, New York County Courts1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API