Legal Opinion
Murawski v. Melkun
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided October 3, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeonard L. Fine, J.
In this proceeding to determine the rights of the petitioner landlord against the respondent, the sole question is whether the respondent is a squatter, as defined under subdivision 3 of section 713 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law.
The facts, which are of some human interest, are as follows:
The respondent, Anna Melkun married Adam Melkun on October 4, 1958, each having been widowed and each having entered into this, their second marriage in the later stages of their lives. Together they lived in one of two apartments of a dwelling-owned solely by the husband, Adam Melkun.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. . AltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Brennecke v. Smith, New York County Courts1964
- Cardosanto v. CardosantoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
- Tausik v. TausikAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1960
- Cheek v. SalkindCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kassover v. Gordon Family Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Rosefan Construction Corp. v. SalazarCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- Rome v. WhiteCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Tik Sun Cheung v. Xaio Man LiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
- 200 Central Park South Associates v. CopersinoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.