Legal Opinion

Tausik v. Tausik

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 1, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtGuy Gilbert Ribaudo, J.

This is a summary proceeding grounded upon subdivision 8 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. The petitioner and defendant are husband and wife living apart from each other. The premises is apartment 3E in the co-operated building 110 East 57th Street, New York City.

The petitioner husband entered into a proprietary lease for this apartment in his own name on August 28, 1958. His right to possession is based upon his ownership as reflected by this lease. Although defendant wife sought to establish an equitable interest in the lease by an alleged vague statement purported to have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cardosanto v. CardosantoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
  2. Cardosanto v. CardosantoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API