Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crosby v. Moorhead

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1916No. 19731PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county; George A. Day, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Rose, J..This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel respondent, as election commissioner of Douglas county, to place upon the official ballot for the election to be held November 7, 1916, the name of relator as a candidate for coroner. The application was resisted on the ground that the legislature of 1915 imposed upon the county attorney the duties of coroner.. Prom a dismissal of the proceeding relator has appealed.

The question presented is the validity of an act entitled :

“An act to provide' that the county attorney shall be ex officio county coroner, that he may…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Van Horn v. State ex rel. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cox v. Royal TribeOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Board of Education v. NastSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Ex parte GistSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Swanson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Wright v. BarneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State ex rel. Taylor v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Drainage District No. 1 v. Kirkpatrick-Pettis Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Munch v. TusaNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API