City of Pasadena v. AT&T Communications of California, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
This appeal addresses the meaning of the word “remit” in the Pasadena Municipal Code (PMC). We conclude, as a matter of law, that to “remit” a tax payment means to send, transmit, or forward money. A payment is thus remitted when it is deposited in the mail. The trial court defined remit as “receive.” We reverse.
Facts
The City of Pasadena (the City) is suing AT&T Communications of California, Inc. (the Company), for breach of a services agreement. As a service supplier, the Company is required to collect a utility users tax from its customers. Each month, the Company pays…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Hodges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS ASSN. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pope v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Pope v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006