Legal Opinion

Lanham v. Forney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1938No. 27122. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— This case comes to the court upon stipulated facts. From the stipulation, it appears, in substance, that, in 1929, the town of Springdale, a Washington municipality of the fourth class, by ordinance, granted to J. P. Lanham, his heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, the right to carry on a gen eral water service business, and to that end to lay, maintain, and operate, in and under its streets, alleys, and highways, the necessary pipes and conduits. The water system was installed shortly thereafter at an approximate expense of twenty-five hundred dollars, and has ever since been in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kemp v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Matter of Green v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Simons v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Total Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. Mac Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Donald and Katrina Simmons v. City of OthelloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. City of Miami v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API