Legal Opinion

Mac Amusement Co. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1981No. 46980-6PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. —

Mac Amusement Company and Mackey & Aubin Concessions Company (hereinafter MAC) brought this action, seeking a refund of taxes assessed pursuant to RCW 82.29A. RCW 82.29A provides for a 12 percent tax, assessed against lessees, on the rent paid for publicly owned property. The trial court held that the rent attributable to favorable location and to monopoly rights is not taxable under that chapter. As to favorable location, we disagree.

MAC is the lessee and operator of the Pun Forest amusement facility at the Seattle Center. Its lease agreement provides, among other things, for a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Strenge v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rena-Ware Distributors, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hayden v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Duwamish Warehouse Co. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. S. Martinelli & Co. v. WASH. STATE DEPT. OF REV.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. Seattle-King County Council of Camp Fire v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Shurgard Mini-Storage of Tumwater v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Washington Mutual Savings Bank v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API