Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1973No. 6167PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The question for decision in this case arising from a petition for declaratory judgment is whether the defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is obligated to furnish insurance coverage relative to an alleged accident to Anna Wexler on or about September 15, 1963, at a building owned by the plaintiff and known as the Casino in Bethlehem, New Hampshire. The trial court held that Liberty Mutual was not obligated to provide coverage under its comprehensive general liability policy nor estopped from denying coverage due to any representations to the plaintiff concerning coverage. The court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rayden Engineering Corp. v. ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Bowen v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. & A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- A. Perley Fitch Co. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Cushman v. County of GraftonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
- Barrette v. Casualty Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Trefethen v. New Hampshire Insurance GroupSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Johnson v. Phenix Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- KJ Quinn & Co., Inc. v. Continental Cas.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Sutton Mutual Fire Insurance v. Ray-Jon, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973