Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Waisman Bros.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 7, 1944No. 3453PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.

The motion for a nonsuit was correctly denied. The defendants do not urgently contend that it should have been granted but confine their argument chiefly to a discussion of the exceptions relating to the issue of special damages. Both parties agree that their rights, so far as that issue is concerned, are governed by the following rule: “In awarding damages, compensation is given for only those injuries that the defendant had reason to foresee as a probable result of his breach when the contract was made. If the injury is one that follows the breach in the usual course of events, there is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrett v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Hurd v. DunsmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
  3. Busick v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  4. Hutt v. HickeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
  5. Davis v. New England Cotton Yarn Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Petrie-Clemons v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Wolford v. FreemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API