Johnson v. Waisman Bros.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.
The motion for a nonsuit was correctly denied. The defendants do not urgently contend that it should have been granted but confine their argument chiefly to a discussion of the exceptions relating to the issue of special damages. Both parties agree that their rights, so far as that issue is concerned, are governed by the following rule: “In awarding damages, compensation is given for only those injuries that the defendant had reason to foresee as a probable result of his breach when the contract was made. If the injury is one that follows the breach in the usual course of events, there is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barrett v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Hurd v. DunsmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
- Busick v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Hutt v. HickeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
- Davis v. New England Cotton Yarn Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Petrie-Clemons v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Wolford v. FreemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.