Legal Opinion

Crocker-Citizens National Bank v. Younger

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1971No. L.A. 29703PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*206Opinion

BURKE, J.

Defendants Marie Eckstrom (Marie) and Thomas F. Eckstrom, Jr., (Thomas) appeal from a judgment decreeing that the appointment of Marie to a trustee’s advisory committee was void, declaring that a vacancy had existed on the committee since the date of her attempted but invalid appointment, and appointing a new member to fill the vacancy. We have concluded that the judgment should be affirmed, with minor exceptions.

The trust which has given rise to this litigation was established in 1950 by Thomas P. Eckstrom, Sr., (trustor) as a revocable inter vivos trust. Crocker-Citizens…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of TraungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Stanton v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Leonardini v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles v. EasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Linsteadt v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Botsford v. Haskins & SellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Estate of GillilandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Matter of Will of KillinColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Allen Trust Co. v. Cowlitz BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API