Legal Opinion

Linklater v. Nyberg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Clayton Nyberg, a county commissioner of Washington county, from the allowance of a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the defendant to audit and approve a voucher for the payment of money out of the “enforcement fund” created by ORS 471.670, ① a section of the Liquor Control Act of this state. The plaintiff is the district attorney of Washington county who had theretofore approved the expenditure.

The record discloses the following facts: On June 28, 1962, the court caused to be issued an alternative writ of mandamus directed to Clayton Nyberg and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. New York Catholic Protectory v. Rockland CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. People Ex Rel. Brown v. . B'd of Apportionm't.New York Court of Appeals · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. SamsOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API