Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Yancy v. Shatzer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 2004No. CC 0008-08313; CA A114776; SC S50280Published

1Concurrence

BALMER, J.,

specially concurring.

This case never presented a justiciable controversy because petitioner’s 30-day exclusion order had expired before he filed his petition for review in circuit court. For that reason, I agree with the majority that the circuit court judgment should be vacated and that the petition filed in the circuit court should be dismissed as moot.1 The majority, however, like the parties, has framed and decided a different and important issue: “whether Oregon courts have the power to consider disputes that, like the present one, are capable of repetition and yet evade…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API