Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles W. Roth, Claimant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1990No. 89-16694PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal of a pretrial order restraining assets issued by the district court under the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984 (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 853. The government argues that the order is not appealable because it is interlocutory. We hold that the order is appeal-able under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) because it is a preliminary injunction. On the merits, we affirm the order.
I
Appellant Charles Roth, who allegedly participated in a large-scale marijuana distribution enterprise, was indicted for various drug related offenses., The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret WolkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Johnny Spain v. Ruth L. Rushen, Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States of America, Alice Harris, Claimant/appellant v. U.S. Currency, $83,310.78Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Joseph A. Kirschenbaum, A/K/A Ari Kirschenbaum, Appeal Of: Julie KirschenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In re Assets of MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.