Legal Opinion
In Re Heritage Bond Litigation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 6, 2003No. CV 01-5752 DT(RCX), CV 02-383 DT(RCX), CV 02-993 DT(RCX), CV 02-2745 DT(AJWX), CV 02-6484 DT(RCX), CV 02-6841 DT(RCX), CV 02-6512 DT(AJWX)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS EDWARD J. HENTGES, KENNETH R. LARSEN, JEROME E. TABOLICH, STEVEN W. ERICKSON, AND PAUL R. EK-HOLM’S MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) AND 9(b)
TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.
I. Background
A. Factual Summary
Plaintiffs Betker Partners One, LP (“Betker One”), Betker Partners Three, LP (“Betker Three”), Betker Family Trust (“Betker Trust”) (collectively, “Bet-ker Plaintiffs”), and Lori and Michael O’Shea (all party Plaintiffs collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action over the alleged…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- P. Stolz Family Partnership L.P. v. DaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- In Re Heritage Bond LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.