In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings came on for hearing on December 6, 2006 before this court. Plaintiffs, indirect purchasers (“plaintiffs”), appeared through their counsel, Allan Steyer, Josef D. Cooper, Tracy B. Kirkham, Daniel E. Gustafson, Christopher L. Lebsock, Terry Gross, Michael P. Lehman, Francis 0. Scarpula, Daniel J. Mogin, and Jill M. Manning. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Julian Brew, Kenneth R. O’Rourke, Peter Nemerovski,…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litigation Indirect Purchaser ClassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.