Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1994No. 21887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter Nationwide) appeals a partial summary judgment order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County requiring Nationwide to provide a defense to Ora “Bud” Patton in a suit brought against him by Charles E. and Annette Smith for assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation. On appeal, Nationwide argues that under Mr. Patton’s homeowner’s insurance policy, Nationwide has no duty to provide coverage or a defense for Mr. Patton’s intentional acts or business pursuits. Mr. Patton argues that because the matter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lieving v. HadleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Horace Mann Insurance v. LeeberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance Co. of West Virginia v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Smith v. Animal Urgent Care, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. First Financial Insurance v. Crossroads Lounge, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001
  5. Acadia Insurance v. Vermont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API