Merchants' National Bank v. Wadsworth
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale; Chester, J. Assumpsit by the Merchants’ National Bank against Fred B. Wadsworth and Burton A. Bowditch on certain promissory notes. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff brought suit on two notes which are alike except as to time when due. We insert but one of the notes. It reads as follows:
“60.00. Pittsford, Mich., Aug. 17th, 1906.
“Aug. 1st, 1909, after date I promise to pay to Fred Ordway, or bearer, sixty dollars at-value received, with interest at the rate of six per cent, payable annually.
[Signed] “Fred B. Wadsworth.
“B. A. Bowditch.”
*529On the back of said notes appears the following:
“ Fred Ordway.” “ J. Crouch & Son.” “ Pay to any hank or banker or order. Merchants’ National Bank, La Fayette, Ind., W. G. Gude, Cashier.”
The defendants pleaded…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. Village of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Tilden v. BarnardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Drovers' National Bank v. PotvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. City of HuronDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of Philpott v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- John Schweyer & Co. v. MellonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- People's State Bank v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Republic National Bank v. BoboMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Miller v. Commercial State Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.